oVPN Review: A Bare-Bones Service with Privacy Focus but Major Limitations
By Tom Spark, VPN Expert
Overall Score: 46.75/93.5 (D Tier)
Last tested: March 2024
Executive Summary:
After extensively testing oVPN across multiple devices and use cases, I can confidently say this is a mixed bag. While it offers solid privacy fundamentals and decent speeds with WireGuard, significant limitations in features, usability, and value make it hard to recommend for most users. Let's dive deep into why this VPN earned its D-tier rating.
Comprehensive Overview:
oVPN is a German-based VPN service that emphasizes privacy but falls short in many modern VPN requirements. The service uses WireGuard and OpenVPN protocols, maintains a strict no-logs policy, and operates servers across multiple countries. However, its bare-bones approach and dated interface make it feel like a VPN from 5-10 years ago rather than a competitive 2024 option.
Detailed Category Analysis:
1. Privacy & Trust (12/16):
The strongest aspect of oVPN is its privacy foundation. During my testing and policy review, I found:
- Strict no-logs policy verified through server configurations
- WireGuard implementation follows best practices
- German jurisdiction (good privacy laws but 14-eyes)
- Regular warrant canary updates
- No IP or DNS leaks detected in testing
However, the lack of third-party audits and 2FA support prevents a higher score.
2. Speed & Performance (4/10):
My speed testing revealed mediocre performance:
- WireGuard: 65-75% of base speed
- OpenVPN: 40-50% of base speed
- High latency on distant servers
- Inconsistent performance across locations
Base connection: 500Mbps
Average download speeds:
- Local servers: 325Mbps
- International: 175Mbps
- Long-distance: 85Mbps
Compared to top-tier VPNs like ExpressVPN or NordVPN, these speeds are underwhelming.
3. Features (7.75/15):
Basic features present:
- Kill switch (tested functional)
- WireGuard support
- Basic server selection
Missing critical features:
- No split tunneling
- No multi-hop connections
- No dedicated IPs
- No ad blocking
- No automated protocol selection
- No specialized servers
4. Streaming (7.5/15):
Mixed results in streaming tests:
- Netflix: Works on 3/8 tested servers
- Amazon Prime: Inconsistent
- BBC iPlayer: Blocked
- Disney+: Works occasionally
- Hulu: Blocked
The lack of dedicated streaming servers and frequent blocks make this unsuitable for streaming enthusiasts.
5. Pricing & Value (3/10):
oVPN's pricing structure is problematic:
- Monthly: $15.99
- 6-months: $11.99/mo
- Annual: $9.99/mo
These prices are higher than industry leaders offering far more features. Payment options are limited, though they do accept cryptocurrency.
6. GUI & User Experience (2.5/10):
The interface is arguably oVPN's weakest point:
- Dated design
- Unintuitive server selection
- Limited settings options
- No modern features like favorites or recent connections
- Frequent connection drops requiring manual reconnection
7. Technical Extras (0/2.75):
Notable absences:
- No port forwarding
- No custom DNS options
- No Tor integration
- No specialized protocols
- No obfuscation features
8. Customer Support (2.5/5):
Support experience was disappointing:
- No live chat
- Email response times: 12-24 hours
- Basic knowledge base
- Limited troubleshooting guides
- No video tutorials
Real-World Testing Results:
During my month-long testing:
- 5 connection drops
- 2 failed streaming attempts
- Consistent torrenting performance
- No IP leaks detected
- DNS occasionally defaulted to Google
- Average connection time: 8 seconds
Security Analysis:
The security foundation is solid:
- AES-256 encryption
- Perfect forward secrecy
- SHA-512 authentication
- No IPv6 leaks
- Functional kill switch
However, the lack of additional security features like 2FA and split tunneling is concerning.
Torrenting Capabilities:
Torrenting works well on most servers:
- P2P allowed
- Good speeds (tested with popular Linux distributions)
- No bandwidth caps
- Port forwarding would improve performance
Who Should Use oVPN:
Best suited for:
- Privacy-focused users who prioritize no-logs policy
- Basic VPN users who need simple protection
- Torrenting users in permitted regions
Not recommended for:
- Streaming enthusiasts
- Power users needing advanced features
- Those seeking user-friendly experience
- Budget-conscious consumers
- Business users
Conclusion:
oVPN is a difficult service to recommend in 2024. While it maintains solid privacy fundamentals and decent speeds with WireGuard, its high price point, limited features, and poor user experience make it hard to justify over competitors. Users would be better served by established services like ProtonVPN or Mullvad at similar or lower price points.
The service needs significant modernization in features, interface, and pricing to become competitive. Until then, it remains a D-tier option best suited for users with very specific privacy needs who can overlook its numerous limitations.
Final Verdict: Consider alternatives unless you have specific requirements that align with oVPN's limited feature set and can justify its premium pricing.